Dear justfuckinggoogleit,
Thank you for taking the time to prepare the splash page. I
would like to point out to you that the use of the word ‘fucking’
provides no linguistic assistance as it is a redundant term. That is, this term
does nothing to assist in the definition of the meaning of the term ‘fucking’.
For example, if you lived in an English speaking country on the east side
of the Atlantic Ocean, ‘bloody’
would suffice. On the west side, ‘goddam’ could be expected. The
use of the word ‘tove’ could work equally as well as our Lord
Ludwig Wittgenstein can attest. Various uses of the word ‘fuck’ as
a noun, verb, object, contortionist behaviour or as an ineffective sexual
reproduction practice (such as ‘go fuck yourself’) allow this
highly contextual and emotive term and its derivations are thoroughly useful in
describing contextual aspects, the use here is superfluous. That is, it adds
nothing to the context except - on this occasion – to demean and
embarrass the recipient. The inclusion of ‘fucking’ in this web
site indicates that there is a frustration and perhaps a lack of compassion on
the part of the protagonist and leaves the recipient without useful direction
except to convey that the originator of the message is directing an emotional
punishment and indicating a distinct impression that the recipient has transcended
some ‘unwritten rule’. As the famous (and still alive for some
reason) philosopher Scott Adams states: ‘If an unwritten rule is so
important, why hasn’t it been written down?’ In summary, the
removal of the word ‘fucking’ will have no bearing upon the value
of this exhortation and should be removed.
I have attached a wav. file that you may find instructive.
Regards,
Andrew Lindhjem
V3 Research and Consulting
PO Box 892
Armadale WA 6992
Telephone: 08 9399 6709
Mobile: 0409 378
381
Email: andrew@xxxxxxxxxxx