[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

fuckinggoogleit - fuckingreat - question from New Scientist

To: rlpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: fuckinggoogleit - fuckingreat - question from New Scientist
From: "Mike.Holderness" <mike.holderness@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:21:49 +0100
Reply-to: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:28:19 -0700
Resent-date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:28:19 -0700
Resent-from: rlpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-message-id: <20040827182819.GM26123@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Resent-sender: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: jfgi@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616

Found you!

Congratulations on a great site.

Bandwidth warning: next week you get a plug in New
Scientist's Feedback column. Took special permission
from the Editor to get the URL into the paper.

The chief sub-editor would like reassurance that
you are not connected with google.com's marketing
team.

My response was that if it is them they deserve
the publicity - but I'd be asking. So I am.

Mike
  Trust me, I'm a journalist

Prev by Date: Your site... well, one of them.
Next by Date: Re: fuckinggoogleit - fuckingreat - question from New Scientist
Previous by thread: Your site... well, one of them.
Next by thread: Re: fuckinggoogleit - fuckingreat - question from New Scientist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread