Re: html stuff on your "site"

On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:38:53PM +0100, 1uk wrote:
> i see you use the ALT tag for image-less browsers, but you don't
> include an informational "popup text"-type-thing for those who do have
> images enabled....
> 
> or maybe you think you do...?

Actually, I don't much care.  There's only one image, and it's pretty
self-explanatory.

> IE uses that ALT tag in 2 ways....

That's nice.  I don't much use it myself.

> You see the two things are not the same. One is for browsers that
> can't / won't display images. The other is for informative purposes
> only.
> 
> You have chosen the first option to cater for the second option.

Actually, I just don't much care about the second option.  I have an
alt tag, that does what I want, I'm happy.

> Just because "it looks right in IE" doesn't make it right. 

I mostly use Opera, actually.

> There's just one thing you didn't do - there's an html tag you didn't
> use (probably because you don't know it exists)
> 
> Implement it and your site will be compliant.
> 
> I'm not the html police, but i was amused somewhat with your
> holier-than-though approach to web users when you can't even put
> together a compliant *one page* "site"
> 
> oh, btw.... that missing html tag? have you justfuckinggoogledit? (do
> you have that domain too?) it's not a secret. it's called <TITLE>
> it'll even make your text links "leap" from the page

Straight from my source:

<title>
    Just Fucking Google It
</title>

So I have no idea what you are talking about.

-Robin